Pravna sredstva protiv odluke o pritvoru sa osvrtom na praksu Vrhovnog suda
Legal remedies against the detention decision with reference to the practice of the supreme court
Abstract: Personal freedom represents one of the basic human rights in modern civilized and democratic societies, a value that is strongly protected by both national and supranational legal instruments, such as the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. This right is certainly not of an absolute nature, and international instruments, as well as domestic regulations, allow this right to be limited. It is precisely the order on pre-trial detention in criminal proceedings, as one of the measures to ensure the presence of the accused, that represents a limitation of this freedom. As it is about restricting one of the basic freedoms, strict conditions have been set that must be met in order for such a restriction to be socially and legally acceptable. Thus, the Code of Criminal Procedure defines the conditions for ordering detention, the purpose of which is to achieve a balance between the individual's right to freedom and the state's interest in the orderly conduct of criminal proceedings. In addition to those conditions, and based on the constitutional guarantees in the case of deprivation of liberty and the right to a legal remedy, the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for and ensures the right to appeal against the first-instance detention decision, which appeal is decided by the Chamber referred to in Article 21, paragraph 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, whose decision, as a second instance, is final and legally binding. This paper analyses the positive legal rules on the determination of detention and the right to appeal against such a decision, especially analysing the judgment of the Supreme Court, which, following a request for the protection of legality, had to take on the creative role of a legislator and resolve the issue unsettled by the positive law – the admissibility of a legal remedy against a second-instance decision on detention, and the consequences of this position of the Supreme Court.
Sažetak: Sloboda kretanja predstavlja jedno od osnovnih ljudskih prava u savremenim civilizovanim i demokratskim društvima, vrednost koja se snažno štiti kako nacionalnim, tako i međunarodnim pravnim instrumentima, poput Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda. Ovo pravo, svakako, nije apsolutnog karaktera, pa i međunarodni instrumenti, ali i domaći propisi omogućavaju da se ovo pravo ograniči. Upravo određivanje pritvora u krivičnom postupku, kao mere za obezbeđivanje prisustva okrivljenog, predstavlja ograničenje ove slobode. Kako se radi o ograničavanju jedne od osnovnih sloboda, to su postavljeni strogi uslovi koji moraju biti ispoštovani kako bi takvo ograničenje bilo društveno i pravno prihvatljivo. Tako, Zakonik o krivičnom postupku opredeljuju uslove za određivanje pritvora, a čija je svrha ostvarivanje balansa između prava pojedinca na slobodu, te interesa države za neometanim vođenjem krivičnog postupka. Pored tih uslova, a polazeći od ustavnih garancija u slučaju lišenja slobode i prava na pravno sredstvo, Zakonik o krivičnom postupku predviđa i obezbeđuje pravo žalbe na prvostepeno rešenje kojim se određuje pritvor, a o kojoj žalbi odlučuje vanpretresno veće iz člana 21, stav 4 Zakonika o krivičnom postupku, čija je odluka, kao drugostepena, pravnosnažna. Ovaj rad analizira pozitivnopravna pravila o određivanju pritvora i prava žalbe na takvu odluku, posebno analizirajući presudu Vrhovnog suda koji je, po podignutom zahtevu za zaštitu zakonitosti, morao da preuzme kreativnu ulogu zakonodavca, te razreši pozitivnim pravom neuređeno pitanje dozvoljenosti pravnog leka na drugostepenu odluku o pritvoru, te posledice ovakvog stava Vrhovnog suda.
engleski
srpski
2024
Ovo delo je licencirano pod uslovima licence
Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 - Creative Commons Autorstvo 4.0 International License.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Keywords: detention, personal freedom, appeal, case-law, Supreme Court
Ključne reči: pritvor, sloboda kretanja, žalba, sudska praksa, Vrhovni sud